| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
DarlinLila  
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 6120
Location: USA - MI
|
 Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:25 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| ScruffyMutt wrote: | | Angelofpurple wrote: | I have already gotten two incorrect votes and both of them shown red and with having to open the 3D window it was clear as day and I was the only one to fail it.
Jamie will failed votes be checked and will they really go against us? I flagged both items already. |
I also would like clarification on this, as I have been doing PR this morning and have failed some dresses because when using the *use 2111 pose there was no underwear on them but they have all passed (and been flagged) |
The only answer I've seen come about for this concern is 'CS will watch it closely'.
And that means . . . what? That they will notice who's got 33% 'incorrect' votes, view what they voted against, see it should've been failed and then what? Go after all those that passed it?
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KimDeLaFere
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 1788
Location: USA - IL
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
If we're still seeing the same thing (getting incorrects while everyone else is passing it), then the new system has already failed. From what I've read, what we feared is indeed happening....the new reviewers are passing stuff without paying attention to the VCG....like I said in the other thread, it's like people installing new software & saying "I Accept" to the EULA without actually reading it. I agree with Tony that the "use *2111" needs to be big & bold on the page...maybe that'll get the hint across, and I'd still like to see a way for us to opt out of getting the predits. I don't want them. I'd prefer to buy them myself.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ScruffyMutt
Joined: 25 Sep 2009
Posts: 17
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
An easier way perhaps would be to have the avatar loading in the *use 2111 pose by default, then after cycling once go back to normal idle stance
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
HairStore
Joined: 24 May 2008
Posts: 3019
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 3:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Oh! Look! A Friday launch - Big fun..........imagine the joy
and...........what is a canceled vote??
_________________
Special DOC Award offer on my page-Check it out  and Mohawk Mania for da Guys |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
o0oeternalo0o
Joined: 05 May 2008
Posts: 221
Location: USA - WV
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| cancelled votes occur when you make changes and resubmit before the item is finished pr . |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KimDeLaFere
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 1788
Location: USA - IL
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ScruffyMutt wrote: | | An easier way perhaps would be to have the avatar loading in the *use 2111 pose by default, then after cycling once go back to normal idle stance |
That would simplify things & keep users in the 3D a lot longer to evaluate, but it can have the reverse effect. A user could say "Alright, I've looked underneath, so it must be ok" & then move on to the next without bothering to look at the chest or the rear. In the cases of rooms & furniture, people would automatically load into the lotus & get annoyed enough to pass them without actually looking....that's especially true of poses, which tend to be more UFI than anything else.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ScruffyMutt
Joined: 25 Sep 2009
Posts: 17
Location: United Kingdom
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| KimAthos wrote: | | ScruffyMutt wrote: | | An easier way perhaps would be to have the avatar loading in the *use 2111 pose by default, then after cycling once go back to normal idle stance |
That would simplify things & keep users in the 3D a lot longer to evaluate, but it can have the reverse effect. A user could say "Alright, I've looked underneath, so it must be ok" & then move on to the next without bothering to look at the chest or the rear. In the cases of rooms & furniture, people would automatically load into the lotus & get annoyed enough to pass them without actually looking....that's especially true of poses, which tend to be more UFI than anything else. |
Yeah true
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
BabyAwesome
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 2078
Location: USA
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| o0oeternalo0o wrote: | | cancelled votes occur when you make changes and resubmit before the item is finished pr . |
my cancelled votes seen on the MY history panel are all other peoples products, so maybe they cancelled the process??
does that mean we get no props for reviewing those?
_________________
Behold The Splendor-Available NOW
Take A Tour
imvu://room/BabyAwesome/Golden+Royal+Chambers
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KimDeLaFere
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 1788
Location: USA - IL
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
No...what he meant was that the ones you voted for were cancelled before the PR process was complete.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MarniDawg
Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 5080
Location: USA - TX
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
How am I supposed to review THIS
if it's a sticker there's no picture of it.. but it doesn't look like it's supposed to be a sticker going off of the text/keywords and catalog location?
soo yeah.. WTF?
_________________
 
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
KimDeLaFere
Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Posts: 1788
Location: USA - IL
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
Now, if it's a sticker but has a "picture pending", I'd fail it because it's misleading....there's no way you can rule on something that isn't there.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DarlinLila
Joined: 29 Mar 2007
Posts: 6120
Location: USA - MI
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| MarniDawg wrote: | How am I supposed to review THIS
if it's a sticker there's no picture of it.. but it doesn't look like it's supposed to be a sticker going off of the text/keywords and catalog location?
soo yeah.. WTF? |
personally, I would just skip it. If I'm that confused over something poorly submitted like that (or the awesomely new system's bug), just skip.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MarniDawg
Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 5080
Location: USA - TX
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 4:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
i did skip it. but i wonder what happened to the way it was where you could see the actual sticker even if they didn't post an image?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
MarniDawg
Joined: 27 Aug 2007
Posts: 5080
Location: USA - TX
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
NO see it did it again! you can't tell me this is a sticker product!! There's some kind of bug going on here:
CLICKY
eta: i can't pass or fail any of these without the tick boxes.
_________________
Last edited by MarniDawg on Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:02 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
brians865
Joined: 09 Dec 2008
Posts: 76
Location: USA - TN
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 5:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ok it really sux bad when it didnt lock me up i kept getting the same product i reviewed a car and the next 3 products were the same car so i stopped doing it went back in and it froze me again and i kow its not my puter so i guess i will lose tier points as i will not be doing pr til its fixed or this crappy version is atleast working right please redo the pr system again as it dont work or better yet do away with it and have your imvu staff do your imvu jobs yourselfs please help us here and make it work right. and is pr still going to count on tier points since everyone can vote now i dont see how thats fair. and make us an option to not to HAVE to accept the preds as i dont want to do that to fellow devs i voted over 100 times and i fell maybe 30 was actually right do to the same product coming up over and over and thats not righ. please make this right or take it off our tier points system as this is not working right and i dont fell devs should be punished |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in for private messages