|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Wolfie
Joined: 30 Oct 2006 Posts: 681 Location: United Kingdom
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
and about bundles. are devs that already make outfit bundles going to see there bundles bought renamed and then sold by someone for a higher price? since when did anyone ask anyones permission from anyone to allow others to sell their work? if i see my items sold can i have to bundle stopped by issuing a DMCA take down? as i never said anyone could profit from my items? does anyone know whether we get notified when a bundle is made using our products? _________________
Last edited by Wolfie on Sat Dec 22, 2007 4:05 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LadyElegantBloodK
Joined: 23 Aug 2007 Posts: 5366 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| My thoughts on this one hand good one hand bad. it will make it easier for the CC's that often work with another CC however on the other hand bad because some CC's don't want to have items set with someone else's bundles. You should offer a collaboration feature instead of this to give us the right to pick and choose. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nyrisse
Joined: 01 Jun 2006 Posts: 1114 Location: USA - NE
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 3:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I see a LOT of my skins (and other pieces) in the outfit contest. I'm not too thrilled about them being thrown into every bundle out there. You know why? Because if someone buys 3-4 of these 'outfit bundles' and they all include the same skin, it isn't the BUNDLE MAKER they're going to ask for compensation, it's the SKIN MAKER. I can just see it now:
Hi, I bought a couple outfit bundles and the same skin you made was in all of them. Since I only got one copy of the skin, can you please reimburse me for the others? Thanks!
Heck, the more I think about it, the more my head hurts. How DO they deal with purchasing bundles when you already own one piece from it??? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
confusticated
Joined: 26 Jul 2006 Posts: 681 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What happens if someone mixes AP poses (for example) with GA furniture, does the bundle automagically become AP, or can the creator class it as GA?
Also I am damned sure I don't want my products associated with music products or from devs with unscrupulous behaviour/ethics.
Cheers Confusticated. _________________ May all your chooks turn into emus, and kick your dunny door down.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
MsOCredits
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 2299 Location: USA
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wolfie wrote: | | and about bundles. are devs that already make outfit bundles going to see there bundles bought renamed and then sold by someone for a higher price? since when did anyone ask anyones permission from anyone to allow others to sell their work? if i see my items sold can i have to bundle stopped by issuing a DMCA take down? as i never said anyone could profit from my items? does anyone know whether we get notified when a bundle is made using our products? |
I know u use to get notified
me and a few friends did sum Group Bundles for clubs and stuff
like one would make the club another the furniture and so forth
and we would get a email saying your pruduct x was useing in so and so's bundle named y
so i know they use to notife us
im not sure if they still do _________________ Waiting for the Day to see IMVU advertised on the Disney channel |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
DROBEWOLF
Joined: 07 Jan 2007 Posts: 392 Location: USA - IN
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Since it was previously only items set to derivable that could be used in bundles, are any items included in a bundle subject to the same non-changing price rules as formerly derived products?
And I agree, hidden products should be saleable only at the original developer's discression. Otherwise we all need to set hidden products to 1,000,000 credits to prevent it being used without authorization. _________________
Black Ty Tuesday won Grand Champion - Stallion!!! Go TyTy! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Flowereater
Joined: 16 Nov 2006 Posts: 220 Location: USA - NY
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| confusticated wrote: | | Also I am damned sure I don't want my products associated with music products or from devs with unscrupulous behaviour/ethics. |
I think this is an excellent point. I don't think this is a good idea for the catalog or for the consumers to begin with, but I think it gives devs more exposure, which can't be bad. In any case though, just the thought that someone could be grouping a product of mine with an illegal music ring is rather nauseating. I will gladly forego the exposure to retain my dignity as a developer. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Arachinidia
Joined: 08 Jun 2006 Posts: 191 Location: USA - CO
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 9:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*blink*
...My two cents:
1) Would it be reasonable to require that unless a product is yours, you would require some form of automated consent from the developer that created it? It could be easy to set up, just have a system where the bundle creator enteres all the desired product ID#s into a form along with a brief synopsis of the theme of the bundle, which is then sent to all developers included. They can individually approve or deny the use of their product before it goes live.
Of course, there are a lot of devs who are inactive, so perhaps there could be some sort of time limit before requests are automatically approved or denied based on a set or preferences?
2) Hidden items shouldn't be able to be sold by other developers without express consent, PERIOD. I have several hidden items that are either custom commissions, unique gifts for friends, or broken demos that have been left to rot. ANY of these would be troublesome for me if they hit the market as easily buyable products.
3) I realize that this entire program might be intended to milk more credits from users, but is it really necessary? I think it would be nice to see either a tiny, SET markup (meaning that it can not be changed, and all outfit bundles will have the same markup), no markup AT ALL (don't let developers charge a markup on outfit bundles, period), or a discount markdown. IMVU marks up all their prices by 10%, why not shave off 5-10% for outfit bundles? Then this could actually HELP the users, stimulate the economy in a positve manner, and still not adversely affect developers' income.
4) Set an automatic redundancy filter into this, PLEASE! As a few people have mentioned, almost NOBODY is going to want to buy a male or female avatar, most people won't need the extra heads, skins, eyes, etc... Partly because they won't want them, but also partly because they already HAVE them! When someone buys a new outfit bundle, IMVU should automatically drop out items that the user already owns, as well as give them the option to remove up to a certain number of items from the bundle before they lose whatever credit bonus or restriction is being given by the bundle.
...Just a few suggestions to keep this whole idea from careening off into certain disaster. _________________
Who do you want to be today? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BlissNoire
Joined: 29 Mar 2007 Posts: 5787 Location: USA - OR
|
Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 10:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Okay, after reading through this thread, I made a bundle to test this. I was Horrified to see that a custom skin, unavailable to anyone but me, was included in that bundle at break even! I have since gone back and edited the bundle to include ONLY my own products. Before then not only were items that were hidden included, but items that were Not derivable were included as well. When I moved to *edit* the bundle, it told me that the items were not derivable and could not be added to the bundle. Fancy that, they were already in it! As I stated before, i have removed all items not belonging to me from the bundle and have hidden it. Still...this is a BAD idea. Far too much can go wrong, and for all the other reasons already mentioned.
Users already have the option to buy the items in outfit challenge outfits by clicking and purchasing the items individually. This is the ONLY safe way for this not to be abused. I do not want my Lollirot skin being sold! I do not want to sell the Jennifer head I use! That is not my product to sell! If another developer wants me to sell their items for them, I am sure they would have asked. Good grief....what were you thinking with this? _________________
Support Stickers to help me keep my home |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sikk
Joined: 26 Oct 2005 Posts: 11584 Location: USA - AZ
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 1:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Matt wrote: | | Insofar as critique of the idea, we are building this because we have been asked to do so numerous times by members of the IMVU community (including some people who have posted here). |
How many of the 7 users who posted before you asked to have their non-derivable products sold by others? I didn't!
I think Wolfie hit it on the head (see bold text)
| Wolfie wrote: | its hard to see this in a positive light, ok there's pluses in the light of maybe increased sales for some. but i feel its bad for the catalogue and bad for the consumer.
lets say its contest time and the theme of the day is Sexy Santa helper or whatever, so anyone who owns there name can sell the outfit they enter, 600 to 800 or more people a day. if a 100 of them decide they want to try recoop some credits by selling that outfit that's 100 similar sexy Santa outfits spammed in to a already burdened catalogue is there any need for this? NO.
so now people who have never deved and couldn't cause they haven't the time or skill can just start selling other peoples creations? is wearing an item really that skilled that they should make a profit and charge a mark up on it?
I really think this is going to cause alot of pain and anger in time. how do hidden items affect it? what if someone makes a outfit bundle using an item i sell that i decide to hide this item? I know many devs that make bundles and outfits to fit coming outfit themes. so someone can buy and then rebundle the items? This would be ok if it was to a limited section of people. Maybe the top 10 winners of a contest. But so many people with so many outfits is going to lead to bundle spam and i fear this will have a negative affect all round. Puls all the points that have been made by others here. |
Remember though, Wolfie... Matt said only developers (aka anyone who has bought their name) will be able to create these bundles.
One of these days I'd like to meet these alleged developers who ask for all these "new and exciting" changes. Maybe at DevCon? Oh wait I went to DevCon2 and met Goose at Chicka's house _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Polystyrene
Joined: 07 Jun 2006 Posts: 20323 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 3:26 am Post subject: |
|
|
So.....when people ask for useless features that will bring imvu more money, no problem imvu will jump to them. But when we ask for things that are actually important and helpful, we get ignored. That's nice.
Matt, you say that "we are building this because we have been asked to do so numerous times by members of the IMVU community". You have also been asked countless times about, for example, email notification of new product reviews. Why don't we get that too?
All these ideas you are bringing in are to the detriment of devs. Couldn't we have one little nice thing for Christmas? _________________
   |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Smexy
Joined: 09 Jun 2006 Posts: 727 Location: USA - FL
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:52 am Post subject: |
|
|
Wonderful.
Now.
other.
people.
can.
sell.
my.
stuff.
Am I supposed to be thrilled by this?
| Quote: | Matt:
6. Is the ability to make a profit off of another Creator's items a new feature? No. As has always been the case with bundles of any kind, any Creator has had, and will have, the ability to sell a bundle for whatever profit they wish. We see no reason to change course on bundle profits just because of this new feature. There is an art to arranging multiple products that look great together. Creators who can do this well have the right to earn a profit for their time and effort. |
Please acknowledge me of a way we could previously make a DIRECT profit off another Creator's items.
Um.
NEVER.
Even more outrageous... you say it's an art?
NO.
CREATING the products is an art.
Color coordinating items (especially ones that were made to go together) is NOT.
Sure. I'm thrilled with the fact that people can put together outfits that other people can buy, but it's the PROFIT part that is bugging me.
Are you telling me that if Creator A makes a bundle, Creator B buys it, then puts on all the items and make an outfit and puts it up for sale with a profit they get money too?
MERRY CHRISTMAS, IMVU.
........................................
<3, Smexy. _________________
Join my Fan Update group!
Click for my tutorials! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Polystyrene
Joined: 07 Jun 2006 Posts: 20323 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
Please give us the option to opt out of this feature. _________________
   |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mercuria  Moderator
Joined: 13 Nov 2004 Posts: 17172 Location: USA - KS
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
I don't think you can purchase duplicate items anymore. I tried and in my cart there was a notation that I already own the item. So, that might preclude problems with outfits containing the same skin, etc.
As there are supposed plans to make the outfit bundles editable, then there is no way we can prevent people from creating them and selling them. I need to make outfits of my own items for my homepage to advertise them. I finally did this but hate the photos and the fact that all poses are included so I need to start over.
Now, if someone does this for me, sure that's great. If customers want to pay a markup on the bundle when they could fill their cart with individual items well, that's up to them. I am too tired to fight it.
But, if any hidden items get put into a bundle, then I'm going to raise holy hell.
Man, think about the Holiday Outfits Bundle. It's exclusive right now. What's to prevent someone from making a profit for a couple weeks on these exclusive items? All of a sudden, that bundle would not be so exclusive nor would it be worth $19.99, eh?
Wow, almost makes me want to buy it and bundle the outfits to prove a point but I'm too cheap and broke to spend $20 just for that.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Whispeer
Joined: 23 Jul 2007 Posts: 1569 Location: USA - FL
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have been following this thread and trying my hardest to make sense of it.
The way I see it is a new dev does not ever have to make a product, but can generate income.
Am I reading this right?
If so, this to me is wrong.
Create your own things.
Why does IMVU do these stupid things, especially right on a weekend or before a holiday? _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
Hide ads? Get VIP!
|
|
You can post new topics in this forum You can reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
| |
|